Open an app to sign in, or try a guided demo.
Technical knowledge that’s easier to trust and maintain.
Technical references grow stale quietly. When engineers cannot tell what is current, what changed, or who reviewed it, the library begins to lose their trust.
Wiki.KIP combines reference checks, worked calculations, revision history, and governed content development in one technical reference. Automated checks help identify what needs attention; engineers decide what becomes approved guidance.
Answers grounded in knowledge you can examine.
A useful answer isn’t enough when its sources, assumptions, or calculations are difficult to follow.
Ask.KIP draws on a firm’s knowledge, provides traceable references, and uses calculation tools where appropriate. Useful conversations can also become proposals for improving Wiki.KIP, subject to engineer review.
Review findings backed by evidence, ready for engineering judgment.
Drawing and specification reviews demand careful, repetitive cross-checking. A long list of suspected problems isn’t helpful unless reviewers can quickly tell what matters and why.
Check.KIP combines programmed checks with AI-assisted investigation to identify, examine, and prioritize potential issues. Findings link to supporting evidence in the project documents, helping engineers decide what warrants action.